“Don’t know much about history. Don’t know much about biology.” I especially don’t know much about gay history, but future generations of California students will.
On July 14, 2011, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law state bill (SB) 48, the FAIR (Fair, Accurate, Inclusive and Respectful) Education Act, a controversial bill that in sensationalist terms forces California schools to teach five-year-old children about the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender (LGBT) lifestyle and agenda, thereby destroying the traditional family. What the bill actually does and says is amend an existing law in two ways:
Require instruction in social sciences to include a study of the role and contributions of not just LGBT individuals but also: “Native Americans, African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, European Americans… persons with disabilities, and other ethnic and cultural groups, to the development of California and the United States.”
Prohibits instruction, school sponsored activities, or adopting instructional materials that reflect adversely upon persons including “Pacific Islanders, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans, persons with disabilities, and other ethnic and cultural groups.”
It sounds pretty dry to me. At the very least California school books will mention the Stonewall riots that sparked the gay rights movement and note the election and murder of San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected U.S. official. Several movies have been made on both topics and are readily available so it’s not exactly revolutionary information. Kids are more likely to know that history than they do the details of Paul Revere’s ride, if Sarah Palin has anything to say about it.
Opposition to SB 48 is predictably hysterical and irrational, focusing on innocent five-year-olds. The fact is rational-minded educators will no doubt develop the curriculum to be age-appropriate the same way they wait until sixth grade (puberty), at least they did when I was a kid, before they teach general sex education.
Protestors probably fear that social studies books will give details about LGBT sexual techniques paired with photos of scantily-clad/naked men and women dancing in pride parades. School books don’t have to do that because newspapers and the internet have that covered. TV has a wide range of depictions of LGBT people on “Modern Family,” “Glee,” and “True Blood.” Switch to cable’s Logo channel and kids in Redding and Fresno can see some pretty risqué gay movies and reality shows, which, I should say, are no worse or nauseating than heterosexual reality shows like “Jersey Shore” and “The Housewives of …” series. Sometimes it’s a matter of taste, not sexual orientation.
The mostly religion-based organizations that are opposed to the legislation are taking steps to repeal it by attempting to put a referendum on the June 2012 California ballot. Their only objection to the bill is the inclusion of LGBT Americans, but presumably repealing SB 48 would also remove the requirement for the other groups added to the law. It was a smart move by the bill’s author, Mark Leno, an openly gay state senator, to package the bill to expand the law for several groups. Voters are unlikely to vote for repealing it just to discriminate against the LGBT population, I would hope.
The legislature passed SB 48 on a vote of 50 to 26; all the Noes were cast by Republicans. Legislative analysis of the bill lists the following opposition organizations, among others:
- Bible Baptist Church
- California Right to Life Committee, Inc.
- Calvary Christian Church
- Concerned Women for America of Central California
- Faith Assembly of God
- First Southern Baptist Church
- GateWay Bible Church
- Hamilton Square Baptist Church
- Heritage Christian Fellowship
- New Harvest Christian Fellowship
- Praise Center Church
- Protect Kids Foundation
- Riverpark Bible Church
- The Conservative Party (California)
- Traditional Values Coalition
In other words, the usual anti-LGBT subjects that defeated California’s Proposition 8, the same-sex marriage bill. The need for SB 48 is reinforced, ironically, by the anti-gay bullying of these organizations as well as by gay intolerance online and in our communities. I came across the Conservapedia website that objects to the alleged left-wing leanings of Wikipedia and promotes itself as “the trustworthy encyclopedia.” However, search Conservapedia for the topic of homosexuality, and the focus is far from scholarly and exhaustive. Instead, they perpetuate hate and ignorance with biased content that has subject headings such as “Commonness of Homosexual Murder,” “Health Effects of Homosexual Lifestyle,” and “the Marketing of Evil.” It’s a laughable attempt to scare youth straight with negativity and idiotic, unscientific arguments. The scary part is that a lot of people will believe their arguments.
My partner Eric recently received a telephone call from a telemarketer ostensibly raising money for the Oakland, CA Police Officers Association. When he said he didn’t accept phone solicitations and asked to be taken off of their call list, the man on the phone replied, “Will do, faggot,” and hung up. Caller ID showed that the telemarketer was TBS Productions (510-568-8483). Eric googled them and found that there have been many complaints against this “professional” fundraiser company. He programmed his phone to block future calls.
These are some fairly benign examples compared to kill-the-gays rap lyrics, anti-gay beatings and murders, and gays sentenced to death by stoning in countries like Iran, Iraq, and Uganda. Yet, conservatives argue that LGBT people don’t need “special” protections under U.S. or state laws.
Some schools in the Bay Area already teach about LGBT accomplishments. A grade school in my Oakland, CA community celebrates Harvey Milk Day and has an openly gay principal. A neighbor who taught at the school said there are several same-sex couples whose children are students at the school. While this is not surprising in the Bay Area, the San Jose Mercury News reported that 2010 Census results “found same-sex couples in every corner of the state, and revealed that those who live in many suburban and rural areas are far more likely to have kids.” So as a result of SB 48, LGBT kids as well as non-gay kids of LGBT parents in non-urban communities will get the same LGBT-inclusive curriculum as Bay Area schools. The authors of the bill said it was necessary to teach children to respect diverse populations, and reduce bullying, particularly against LGBT youth. A long-term result may be that rural and suburban LGBT kids might be able to live open and productive lives without escaping to the big cities.
Personally, I’m against mentioning the sexual orientation of historical figures just for the sake of it. Encyclopedias and grade school history books don’t usually touch upon the personal lives of historical figures, straight or gay. While they will mention the wives of U.S. presidents, I don’t recall my history or social studies teachers talking about the love lives of most likely heterosexual people such as Paul Revere or Winston Churchill. So I wouldn’t expect books to have to automatically mention that Joan of Arc or Richard III were homosexual unless they crusaded for gay rights and/or heterosexual genocide.
Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas, on the other hand, are inseparable, and their sexuality and partnership are a component of their accomplishments. They are, however, literary figures, and it’s unclear if SB 48’s “social sciences” directive would include their contributions. When Stephen Colbert on Comedy Central reported on SB 48, he joked that students will be taught about a milestone in gay history: Paul Lynde being given the center square on “Hollywood Squares.” Where California educators draw the line on notable contributions will be challenging. Most likely, those decisions will be made by text-book publishers. Come to think about it, there’s an opportunity for someone, starting a Rainbow Primers publishing company.
I think it’s important that students don’t automatically assume, as I did in my youth, that all historical figures were heterosexual. I admired and wanted to emulate people such as Daniel Boone, Benjamin Franklin, Harriet Tubman, and John F. Kennedy. If my English teachers had mentioned that poet Walt Whitman was gay, it might have been easier for me to come out, knowing that an accomplished writer was openly gay. Whitman’s sexual orientation is romantically and sensually celebrated in chapters of Leaves of Grass, and, therefore, is an integral part of his work. Because of his candor in the 1850s, he had to fight for many years to get his work published, an important lesson about American civil rights.
Eric and I have been watching, on Netflix’s instant-streaming, a 12-part History Channel series from 2010 called “America: The Story of Us.” During the episode on the Revolutionary War, our ears perked up when the narrator said that General Baron von Steuben was a homosexual who “changed the course of the War.” Von Steuben came to America to assist U.S. troops on a referral from Benjamin Franklin and joined the Continental Army as a volunteer in February 1778. In three months he became its celebrated inspector general. It was explained that von Steuben was “an ex-Prussian army officer, an elite soldier whose career is said to have been ruined by his homosexuality. But Washington makes him one of the most powerful men in his command.” Luckily for the fledgling country, the military didn’t have the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy at the time.
Von Steuben received about five minutes in the “Story of Us” episode. He joined Washington’s cold and starving volunteer troops during the harsh winter in Valley Forge, and soon built them into a cohesive unit. Von Steuben trained the troops how to use firearms more efficiently, including how to fight with bayonets, “which proved to be pivotal in winning future battles.” He is cited as having been an instrumental leader in several battles including the Yorktown, Virginia battle that won the War. Among his other accomplishments are putting latrines on the opposite end of the camp from the kitchens and living quarters, thereby reducing disease among the soldiers at Valley Forge.
I will admit that my memory of Revolutionary War history is dim, so it’s not surprising that I don’t remember learning about Baron von Steuben. Google him though, and you will find that he is a major historical figure:
- A query on the Library of Congress American Memory website brings up 333 citations, including letters written by and to the Baron.

- There are statues of von Steuben in the north-west corner of Lafayette Park across the street from the White House, at Valley Forge National Historic Park (the National Park Service has a detailed page of information about von Steuben and a photo of that statue), and in Utica, NY, near where von Steuben lived his last years on a Congressional pension. On the back of the statue pedestal in Washington D.C., a medallion has images of von Steuben’s aides-de-camp, William North and Benjamin Walker, to whom he left his property in New York on his death.
- In New York and Philadelphia there are annual German-American Steuben Parades in September.
- The Steuben Society of America was founded in May 1919.
- In both New York and Ohio the cities of Steubenville are named after the Baron.
- Late journalist Randy Shilts mentions von Steuben in his book Conduct Unbecoming about gays in the military.
- The documentary “Von Steuben’s Continentals: The First American Army” was released on DVD in 2007.
- You can buy lots of von Steuben merchandise online!
I also looked him up in Eric’s 1962 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. The von Steuben entry recounts his noble lineage and military service for both Prussia’s Frederick the Great and Washington. Von Steuben’s Regulations for the Order and Discipline of the Troops of the United States (1779) was the official “blue book” manual of the American military until 1812. Many of the manual’s methods are still used today. The encyclopedia entry doesn’t mention his homosexuality, but Paul Revere’s entry doesn’t mention his marital status or sexual orientation either (though maybe I shouldn’t assume Revere was straight). Wikipedia’s entry on von Steuben does mention his “alleged” homosexuality.
Besides ancient gay history, I hope that recent accomplishments of LGBT people will also appear in the curriculum. Our local newspapers had a lot of coverage of Mark Bingham, an openly gay public relations executive and athlete. He joined United Flight 93 passengers on 9/11 in foiling terrorists by bringing down the plane in rural Pennsylvania so it wouldn’t reach its intended target. Recently, a Facebook friend posted a story that I didn’t see in the San Francisco newspaper about the attack by a lone gunman on a Norwegian summer camp. During the attack, a married Lesbian couple used their boat in four trips to ferry 40 kids off of the island to safety on the mainland.
If you support California’s SB 48, I recommend you sign the Courage Campaign’s petition to block the referendum to repeal SB 48.
If you don’t think California schools should teach gay history, I don’t need to supply you with a link. The SB 48 opposition will undoubtedly find you and tell you what to think and do.
********************************************************************************
State Bill 48 (FAIR Education Act) Update for 2012
The new California law requiring inclusion of historically important LGBT and other minorities in public school curriculums became effective January 1, 2012!! That is great progress, though it will take several years before textbooks are revised. In the meantime, Wikipedia has a list of notable LGBT people who have contributed to society and culture.
Despite the historical Act now becoming the law of the land, organizations opposed to SB 48 are still working to repeal it. A coalition of anti-LGBT organizations failed to get enough signatures to qualify to put a referendum on the November 2012 California ballot to repeal the law in its entirety. They haven’t given up. Recently, two organizations requested title and summary from the Attorney General to put three different initiatives on the November 2012 ballot that want to tweak, not repeal, SB 48. They’re not mincing any words this time around, no pun intended. One initiative just wants to remove from SB 48 the words: “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” and “sexual orientation.”
A second initiative would allow parents to opt their children out of social science and family life instruction that conflicts with their “religious training or beliefs” including “personal and moral convictions.” That’s an interesting one as it could work both ways, with the possibility of removing all kids from the classroom at one time or another for specific social science lessons. Those opposed to the LGBT lifestyle would not allow their children to be present for lessons on Walt Whitman, Gertrude Stein, Harvey Milk, or Barney Frank. Gay and lesbian parents might not want their children to learn about the Ku Klux Klan or Nazi Germany. Muslim families could pull their kids when anything is taught about Christianity. The list goes on ridiculously, creating an administrative nightmare for educators.
The third initiative, sponsored by the notorious Louis Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition, simply wants to strike out the language that SB 48 added and restore the original wording of the Education Code.
Equality California has a website to “Protect the FAIR Education Act.” Once the initiatives clear the state Attorney General’s and Secretary of State’s offices, look for the anti-LGBT folks in front of your local California markets and churches with their clipboards attempting to gather signatures in a 150-day window. You can’t voice your opinion on the Christian Coalition website unless you become a registered member. A couple of brave souls have posted critical comments on the Christian Coalition Facebook wall, but it is truly like talking to a wall. You can’t become their friend, and so far they only have 114 likes.